Apple's lawsuit claimed Samsung, now the world's biggest handset maker, copied the design and other features of the iPhone as the smartphone market was exploding.
Those design elements were protected, prompting the jury to award Apple all the profits from sales of smartphones containing those features, Samsung lawyers said in their filing.
Indeed in parallel with the court case - and the evolving iPhone - Apple has also been working to extricate itself from its dependence on Samsung's components.
The lawsuit started in 2011, when Apple alleged that Samsung's Nexus Android phones infringed on Apple's patents, trademarks, user interface and style.
US Mideast peace plan to be announced soon: Kushner
Abbas cut communications with the Trump administration after it recognised Jerusalem as the capital of Israel in December 2017. The Islamic militant group Hamas that rules Gaza has led three months of protests that turned violent.
Documents filed with the Northern District Court of California this morning indicate that both parties have agreed to drop and settle the remaining claims and counter claims in their legal battle. Apple had originally been granted more than $1bn in damages from its South Korean nemesis, having convinced the courts in a 2012 ruling that Samsung had infringed on its distinctive iPhone design with various Galaxy handsets. But the last major event in the case came in May when the court ordered Samsung to pay Apple $539 million in damages. It was ordered to pay the United States tech giant more than $1 billion for infringing on three of Apple's design patents related to mobile devices - the quick links to phone numbers, the slide-to-unlock feature and the auto-correct function.
With the settlement of remaining claims and counterclaims in the Apple v. Samsung fight, Apple ends a long battle that its late co-founder Steve Jobs once fervently waged.
Samsung paid $548 million of the $1.05 billion owed to Apple in 2015, but appealed all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court to reverse the $399 million decision.
The case had been sent back to the district court following a Supreme Court decision to revisit an earlier $400 million damage award.
- Lakers Receiving Pressure To Trade For Kawhi Leonard Because of LeBron
- Trump gets new Supreme Court pick as critical 'swing vote' resigns
- U.S. to Present North Korea with Timeline Outlining Specific Requests
- Divided European Union leaders hold talks on migration
- Novak Djokovic hopes are dashed as Marin Cilic clinches Queen's title
- What's that extra in my online cart? Soon, maybe a sales tax
- Lakers reportedly aiming to have LeBron James team up with Chris Paul
- Erdogan faces major test as Turks vote for president, parliament
- "Making A Murderer" Convict Brendan Dassey’s Case Denied By Supreme Court
- Book award drops Laura Ingalls Wilder's name over her lack of 'inclusiveness'