The order was passed by a five-judge Constitution bench comprising Chief Justice of India Dipak Kumar Misra, Justice AK Sikri, Justice AM Khanwilkar, Justice DY Chandrachud and Justice Ashok Bhushan, headed by Chief Justice of India Dipak Misra.
Thus the Constitution Bench held that an adult human being having mental capacity to take an informed decision has right to refuse medical treatment including withdrawal from life saving devices.
Feb 15, 2016: Centre says that it is deliberating the issue. India's law commission in its 241st Report titled "Passive Euthanasia- A Relook" had proposed that a legislation be enacted on "Passive Euthanasia".
It includes authorising the kin to switch off life support in case a medical board declares the patient beyond medical help. The court has, however, laid down stringent guidelines for the administration of passive euthanasia and the enforcement of living wills. A "living will" is made by a person, in his normal state of mind, seeking voluntary euthanasia in case of terminal illness, if he or she reaches an irreversible vegetative state.
"To deprive an individual of dignity at the end of life is to deprive him of meaningful existence", the Bench said. This judgment was passed in wake of Pinki Virani's plea to the highest court in December 2009 under the Constitutional provision of "Next Friend". January 16, 2006: SC allowed the Delhi Medical Council (DMC) to intervene and asked it to file documents on passive euthanasia.
Passive euthanasia is now legal: Supreme Court permits 'living will' for terminally ill patients
A living will sets out a patient's wishes regarding how they want to be treated if they are seriously ill.
Before proceeding with the decision, the medical practitioner will be required to inform persons including the spouse, or parent, etc of the need (or otherwise) for withdrawing treatment.
In India, the debate over euthanasia began years ago after the case of Aruna Shanbaug captured national attention.
In active euthanasia, a person or medical professionals directly and deliberately do something for the death of the suffering patient.
The 2011 judgement had put the onus on doctors to petition to withdraw life support, under the supervision of the courts.
While legalising passive euthanasia on Friday, the chief bench defined Active euthanasia as "a positive act or affirmative action or act of commission entailing the use of lethal substances or forces to cause the intentional death of a person by direct intervention, e.g., a lethal injection given to a person with terminal cancer who is in bad agony".
Luigi's Mansion Remake, Mario & Luigi: Bowser's Inside Story & More Coming To 3DS
Though the game looks to be mostly the same as the GameCube original, there are a few differences for the 3DS version. Now anyone that jumped into the series with Dark Moon on 3DS, can jump back and experience the original mansion.
- New $10 Bill Honouring Viola Desmond's Courage Is Here. And It's Vertical
- Iran rebuffs French FM demands to curb missiles on Tehran visit
- Mark Cuban investigated in 2011 for sexual assault at Portland nightclub
- Beijing official urges efforts for Xi's 'Chinese Dream'
- Northeastern US hit by second major storm in a week
- Initial 911 call in officer-involved shooting traced to Windsor
- US Broadcom Probe Cites Fears China Could Dominate 5G
- New theory over ex-spy 'poison attack' in Salisbury
- Sexton's buzzer-beater lifts Alabama over Texas A&M in SEC tourney
- BLS: Employment up 313000; unemployment rate unchanged